Activity Stream

thank you dear @2kaud, now it's perfect and correct.

main() is a special function such that if no return value is specified via return statement, then by default 0 is assumed to be returned. This only...

@2kaud Yes, its great and works correctly, but could you please explain that why it never return any value?

Do you mean like this? #include <iostream> #include <limits> #include <vector> #include <algorithm> int main() {

. Cheers!

string is part of the std:: namespace. So std::string static currentPosition(); //--Line 12----Error here------ and likewise for the other...

Did you try static string currentPosition();

Your point is right but your aim is a little bit off if I may say so. :) But maybe you're just not used to strong opposition. Anyway, thanks again...

The purpose of my post is to explain to the uninitiated readers who land on this page how inhertiance can be abused and to warn that the common-sense...

Usage of the classes drives somewhat the underlying design. If, say, a container is required to accommodate both (c++17 variant not withstanding),...

The purpose of my design (in #28) is not to "create a Square out of a Rectangle". If that was my aim I certainly wouldn't have used inheritance....

I am not saying your code is wrong, but that it does not follow the most reliable structure for creating a Square class out of a Rectangle class. ...

You mean that my design (in #28) is in accordance with the LSP when it comes to methods but not to constructors? Well, it's common practice not to...

Playing with this MSDN sample may be a good start!

immutability does not solve the problem that the constructor for a Square cannot replace the constructor of a Rectangle; it merely solves the problem...

I tried your code and it seems to work fine. The only real issue I see is that if you show form1 then form2 then form1 and close form 2 it is not...

Hi there We know this is our second post on this forum, but we do not have enough responds yet. We noticed that a lot of you have clicked the link...

As per Wolle's post, in c++ I wouldn't class polymorphism using a pure virtual base class as 'source code shenanigans'!

See also this thread http://forums.codeguru.com/showthread.php?560001-C-Books