georgekoontz
July 22nd, 2002, 12:10 AM
I am designing a small Windows based application.
If the application must be able to run on Legacy windows systems (Win 9x, ME, NT), is it correct to say that using Visual Studio .NET is not an option?
I develop in VB and/or VC++. Does Visual Studio .NET have special support for producing standalone executables that could run without the .NET Framework--i.e. produce a legacy executable suitable for Win 9x, ME, or NT.
The idea seems admittedly improbable, but the cost of three Visual Studio licenses is large relative to my budget and other expenses. .NET is in the future migration path, but I believe legacy Windows support is need to provide the necessary market for the first release of the software. If I could develop using Visual Studio .NET now and still support the legacy OS, this seems to make sense since within a year or two the product might move to .NET.
Any information or advice would be greatly appreciated.
If the application must be able to run on Legacy windows systems (Win 9x, ME, NT), is it correct to say that using Visual Studio .NET is not an option?
I develop in VB and/or VC++. Does Visual Studio .NET have special support for producing standalone executables that could run without the .NET Framework--i.e. produce a legacy executable suitable for Win 9x, ME, or NT.
The idea seems admittedly improbable, but the cost of three Visual Studio licenses is large relative to my budget and other expenses. .NET is in the future migration path, but I believe legacy Windows support is need to provide the necessary market for the first release of the software. If I could develop using Visual Studio .NET now and still support the legacy OS, this seems to make sense since within a year or two the product might move to .NET.
Any information or advice would be greatly appreciated.