::std

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 17.6.1.1 Library contents

3: Whenever a name x defined in the standard library is mentioned, the name x is assumed to be fully qualified as ::std::x, unless explicitly described otherwise. For example, if the Effects section for library function F is described as calling library function G, the function ::std::G is meant.

---

I was reading the standard, and came across this. I noticed that the std namespace was fully qualified to reference the "global" std namespace. While I realize it is probably overkill to do it in an everyday program ("::std::string myString"), I asked myself this question: Can it even serve a use to fully qualify std? I know the standard makes it illegal to put anything inside the std namespace (except for full template sepcializations), so is there a point?

Can you think of a case where writing ::std would be mandatory?

I suppose it may be necessary if someone has created a 'std' namespace within another namespace.

This won't compile without the :: qualifier.

Code:

---

#include <algorithm>

namespace application
{
    namespace std
    {
    }
}

using namespace application;

int main()
{
    int a[10];
   
    ::std::distance(&a[0], &a[10]);
}

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JohnW@Wessex

I suppose it may be necessary if someone has created a 'std' namespace within another namespace.

This won't compile without the :: qualifier.

Code:

---

#include <algorithm>

namespace application
{
    namespace std
    {
    }
}

using namespace application;

int main()
{
    int a[10];
   
    ::std::distance(&a[0], &a[10]);
}

---

---

I had thought of that, but that would be the only case right? Besides, are you even allowed to do that?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monarch_dodra

Besides, are you even allowed to do that?

---

Yes, you are.

Thanks for your answers.