Type: Posts; User: cup
Search took 0.05 seconds.
March 23rd, 2013, 01:28 PM
It is not the screen size: it is the pixel resolution you need to worry about.. What is the pixel resolution of your 17" screen and what is the pixel resolution of your 10" screen. In the worst...
October 13th, 2012, 04:24 AM
The main problem with GUI based stuff is that it is not directed. With a console based form, the user will have to go from one field to another in order or at least current previous and next are...
August 28th, 2012, 04:09 PM
Thanks - I didn't know about winhttp and HTTP server API. That's a good starting point.
August 26th, 2012, 01:29 AM
I am using an increasing number of applications which can be serviced from a web page. These apps do not need tomcat, apache or IIS to be installed but they are able to serve out web pages on...
March 5th, 2012, 08:13 AM
Print as %.2f if it is a float or %.2lf if it is a double
April 20th, 2010, 10:30 PM
In Intel assembler, there is an return instruction which pops a fixed number of parameters from the stack. Unfortunately most C compilers do not use this as the caller knows how many it added and...
December 17th, 2009, 08:25 AM
Is the spelling of stringTokeniser.hpp correct? Is the casing correct?
December 8th, 2009, 09:09 AM
Is it possible for you to uninstall and reinstall VSExpress? Looks like possibly one of your DLLs is corrupted.
December 8th, 2009, 09:02 AM
What sort of calls are you having problems with: system calls, threads or GUI calls?
For most system calls, have a look at the "Unix Applicaiton Migration Guide" in VS help. Tells you most of...
December 8th, 2009, 08:51 AM
It really depends on the code generation options. I'm assuming you're using visual studio. If you set both debug and release to use the same code generation options and remove any ignore statements...
November 3rd, 2009, 08:22 AM
Just to reiterate what happened - the () makes it a forward declaration: not a variable declaration.
August 21st, 2009, 02:58 PM
It could be a name mangling problem. Change your libSequential code to
extern "C" void libMethod()
August 20th, 2009, 08:18 AM
Type ldd mainapp
It should tell you what mainapp can see.
You probably need to put the directory containing libSequential.so in LD_LIBRARY_PATH. If you're using HPUX-10, it is LIBPATH.
August 20th, 2009, 08:15 AM
Are you thinking of GUI, Web, embedded or console applications?
November 7th, 2008, 10:00 AM
Self modifying executables are quite dangerous: most systems do not allow it. The main problem is that there are checksums embedded in the executable. If you don't patch them correctly, it stops...
November 7th, 2008, 09:39 AM
Try the (LPCTSTR) or (LPCSTR) operator
HWND closer = FindWindow(NULL, (LPCSTR) closepath);
October 15th, 2008, 01:25 PM
Guess I'm about 5 years behind - comes from maintaining legacy code where things still have to be done the old fashioned, clunky way.
October 15th, 2008, 12:36 AM
Have a look at http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cs/unmanagedtomanaged.aspx for starters.
Normally you need a whole load of interface wrappers which are just one liners and quite tedious to write but...
October 14th, 2008, 07:48 AM
Why do you need to do this? Why not either write everything in C# or everything in C++?
I'd imagine you can only do this in managed C++. Are you trying it in managed or unmanaged C++?
June 25th, 2008, 04:32 PM
Just a long shot. Compile as position independent code and use gcc or g++ to do the linking
CFLAGS=-g -Wall $(INCLUDE) -fPIC
It is something I've noticed...
June 25th, 2008, 07:52 AM
120: static simple_ptr<T> s_pObject;
121: static char s_objectState = 0;
120: extern simple_ptr<T> s_pObject;
June 11th, 2008, 06:55 PM
Why not just use hash_compare. Have you had a look at the examples?
You could try FLTK. It doesn't have stacked barcharts: only ordinary barcharts but it does come with source code and a nice set of test programs which you can use as starting points, though the...
January 30th, 2008, 04:15 PM
If you don't get any suitable responses, it might be worth trying the database forum http://www.codeguru.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=51
January 23rd, 2008, 02:05 PM
I disagree - I think Unicode is a lot simpler than MBCS. Not as simple as SBCS but definitely simpler than MBCS. If by MBCS, you meant SBCS then ignore what I've said.
For instance, how do you...
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width