ignoring what? I don't insist or prove anything, I just said I followed his suggestions.. didn't you see that part? I used an array instead those 10 static global variables. so why you say I am...
that's uncivil.
You had a wrong interpretation there, because if you read correctly this post you can
discover that I was talking about the bugs in the code, not about compiler bugs.
compiler bugs...
guys, I want to say that I understand what Paul said. Is not that the C/C++ language is unsafe, but is rather that undefined behavior can occur if the program/programmer is out of the specifications....
you don't even know what bugs are we talking about, if not you probably can point to the specific line in one of the different codes that were exposed here, so you can show us what specific bug you...
that's your story, and you say I'm a fool because I found some compiler bugs?
is not my fault if those bugs are there, bugs that you didn't have idea of their existence,
that's why you can't say...
The funny thing of all this, is that you still are speaking the same
argument that is very obvious to anyone (FOR ME TOO), it's like you need to say it again
so you're going to believe it.
Alright, but why you tell me that again? I tell you the reason.
Because Paul came here with ANOTHER code and that brought again the discussion about the un-guaranteed behaviour. So if you are...
if the code is "buggy", as you only said (speak for your own please), then why
you tell that to me? is not even my code, is Paul's code. he posted it for
a reason that still I don't...
Well Reubens, it seems you are the only person here that knows how to answer something.
I really appreciate that kind of answers, no matter if I was right or wrong.
To Paul, just to show you that I don't want to fight you, because I am very objective when I talk about programming issues, I show you another image that can make a point of why I was giving...
the only code that failed is yours. mine worked as you saw in the image, if that wouldn't be the case, then I didn't answer you to that kind of program you came with, that is irrelevant to all this...
Correct, no one needs to be in contact with my code as long as they can get the idea of all this. Something that seemed hard for a lot of people till now. maybe because they never saw something like...
laserlight, you know I said before this is all about typecasting,
I came with a test code that is working for me, and is good enough to show my point.
if the code does not work in x64 systems or if...
useless functionality? since this is just another way of doing things and it's working so probably you have no idea what's going on at all.
the implementation works for me, considering that the code...
yeh stop saying that an array must be used or I will get crazy of hearing you, I told you the problem doesn't involve the use of an array, struct or whatelseever.
Also , you seem to know about...
Sorry guys but I have to say your comments are very poor of quality,
because in first place, the beginner has nothing to do with all this, maybe Paul came with an acceptable appreciation..
I recently helped a beginner with solving some situation. he needed
to load 10 integer numbers, getting to list them and to tell how many of them
resulted in a repetition (and how many times!).
...
yeahh well about that of the strlen, i knew that it would be made every loop, but this is actually the second version of this program.. see the previous version:...
