June 23rd, 2006, 03:22 PM
Is a list of the changes from 7.1 to 8.0 available?
June 23rd, 2006, 01:04 PM
If someone tries to instantiate my class or derives a class from it without implementing the pure virtual function the compiler gives him an error. And the compiler should only give him the error but...
June 23rd, 2006, 10:39 AM
Why does the compiler give me a warning that my class is not abstract if I have a pure virtual function?
But if I declare my class to be abstract without any pure virtual functions I don't get a...
June 23rd, 2006, 10:26 AM
Why were the ref / value keywords introduced? I don't see any value they add to the language, they only seem to unnecessary complicate things.
Why can't I inherit a value struct from an other...
June 23rd, 2006, 06:12 AM
I've already raised the question here http://www.codeguru.com/forum/showthread.php?t=391655, but since it's an own topic I make a separate post.
What are the benefits if I compile my MFC/Win32...
June 23rd, 2006, 05:55 AM
Thanks, but that doesn't address the issues someone has who develops a library with VS2005 which is also beeing used with VS6/2002/2003. Even if you only ship the headers and a libray and no sources...
June 22nd, 2006, 04:27 PM
From a 3rd party vendor a .NET linker is available, which links the required assemblies together and allows the deployment of the application without the whole framework.
That also allows better...
June 22nd, 2006, 04:05 PM
That sounds like code duplication instead of reusing a single source?
June 22nd, 2006, 03:54 PM
No, opening and converting the project files works fine, but I continue to work with VS6 - atleast until SP1 is available - and only use VS2005 to check if my code compiles without warning and...
June 22nd, 2006, 01:09 PM
Thanks for your reply Nikola.
Steve Teixeira wrote in his blog that we are in a in-between area of MFC and the next generation application framework.
What are the plans and timeframe for this...
June 22nd, 2006, 12:49 PM
It would be great if dsw/dsp files could be build with devenv without having to convert the files.
June 22nd, 2006, 08:12 AM
There are a few things that I don't like about the code that is generated for WinForms:
a) Each member is preceded by the access specifier, instead I would like to have blocks.
June 21st, 2006, 05:51 PM
I don't agree with you. The MessageMapFunctions union might not be 'nice', but as already said in my other post (Mfc.net) it's more powerful.
Delegates would be easily possible in native...
June 21st, 2006, 04:10 PM
value struct myStruct
June 21st, 2006, 03:58 PM
The designer always puts a this-> in front of all calls, if I remove the this-> the code still compiles but the designer doesn't work any longer.
Also I am used to have a public, then a protected...
June 21st, 2006, 03:37 PM
I would like to see the MFC programming model beeing brought to .NET for C++ developers.
Currently .NET - or at least WinForms - is VB'ish with event handlers like menuItemToolStripMenuItem_Click....