Search:

Hi!

I have following property providing a get/put function for settings an interface:

[propget, id(1)] HRESULT Type([out, retval] IMyType **pVal);
[propput, id(1)] HRESULT Type([in] IMyType...

Hi !

Thanks for answering so fast !

Yes, I know that (standard) way, but I don't want to "override" all getter - methods, and I also don't want to provide a new method, like


const CRect*...

Hi !

I want derive my class as protected from its baseclass, e.g.


class CMyRect : protected CRect
{
}

because nobody should change CRect directly, but I would like to provide a...

Hi !

I have some member function templates like:



class CMyClass : public CMyBase
{
public:
template < class T > BOOL Find( std::vector< T > elem );

Hi Paul !

Thanks for your answers.
Of course every object has a destructor. I ment that I need no virtual destructor, because my derived class won't need one and it's only for my internal...

Hi Paul !

Thanks for your fast answer.

I need no destructor, because I only introduce some new methods, e.g.:
Since I only have pointers in my lists, sets,... and want to access them directly,...

Hi !

deriving from list::iterator and vector::iterator is no problem, but how can I derive from set::iterator ?

I've tried

template < class T, class Pred = less<T>, class A = allocator< T >...

A different approach (and even more advanced) would possibly be more performant:

I create a new type of iterator, which can iterate over different lists (with derived elements), e.g.

list< A*...

The first version also doesn't compile in VC6.0 (that's what I've tried in my first attempt), but std::copy is fine !
Thanks a lot !!!!

unfortunately not, because each list is used in its own context, but at many circumstances I need a collection of elements from two or more lists.

Hi !

I have lots of STL lists, lets say
list< A* > m_listA;
list< B* > m_listB;
list< C* > m_listC;
…..
where B derives from A, and C from B,….

Many times I have to return two...

Good idea, but I only want to prevent from one single, specific Redo (the one, I generate myself by calling Undo())

Hi !

When I call CRichEditCtrl's Undo() method; my last change is undone and I get the chance to "Redo" that modification.

Does anybody know, how to prevent from "Redo" ?

In other words: I...

Does anybody know how to hook into CRichEditView's Undo / Redo Management (to see, when / what is changed, disable some changes...)

Thanks !

may templates help ?

you are right mamotron:
resizing the array is bad, but we also can take my solution and swap x[i] with the last unused element instead of deleting it :)

maybe this helps:
1) create an array (size 400000) and fill it with values from 1 - 400000

2) create a randum number X between 1 and actual array-size

3) return value of array[X] as "real...

Yeah, I also can put it in a "not - CWnd derived class" and derive my views from this class and the old base class, like

class CMyViewBase
{
void DoEditCopy();
}

class CMySpezialView1 :...

There's no need to run as a service.
The first client starts the server, when the last client closes, the server is unloaded (you don't have to care about that, everything is handled from (D)COM)
...

I can't use a class "between", because not all my views derive from CView.
E.g. one derives from CRichEditView (which derives from CView)

So where would be "between" ?

Maybe you can use a COM Server:
Every Client registers on that server for "listening"
After every database update, the COM Server is informed and fires a corresponding event to all registered...

Hallo !

I have some views which handle partly the same commands (e.g. every view has a "OnEditCopy") in the same way.

Thus I want to share that code in a common base class, but my views derive...

Please, can you explain how to use LiveConnect ?
I didn't find a description in msdn.

I create COM Server using the <OBJECT> tag.

How can I determine (with Javascript - code), that the server was created properly ?

Use SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) directly !
Look at the sample at codeguru