Search:

It is not the screen size: it is the pixel resolution you need to worry about.. What is the pixel resolution of your 17" screen and what is the pixel resolution of your 10" screen. In the worst...

The main problem with GUI based stuff is that it is not directed. With a console based form, the user will have to go from one field to another in order or at least current previous and next are...

Thanks - I didn't know about winhttp and HTTP server API. That's a good starting point.

I am using an increasing number of applications which can be serviced from a web page. These apps do not need tomcat, apache or IIS to be installed but they are able to serve out web pages on...

Print as %.2f if it is a float or %.2lf if it is a double

In Intel assembler, there is an return instruction which pops a fixed number of parameters from the stack. Unfortunately most C compilers do not use this as the caller knows how many it added and...

Is the spelling of stringTokeniser.hpp correct? Is the casing correct?

Is it possible for you to uninstall and reinstall VSExpress? Looks like possibly one of your DLLs is corrupted.

What sort of calls are you having problems with: system calls, threads or GUI calls?

For most system calls, have a look at the "Unix Applicaiton Migration Guide" in VS help. Tells you most of...

It really depends on the code generation options. I'm assuming you're using visual studio. If you set both debug and release to use the same code generation options and remove any ignore statements...

Just to reiterate what happened - the () makes it a forward declaration: not a variable declaration.

It could be a name mangling problem. Change your libSequential code to


extern "C" void libMethod()
{
...
}

Type ldd mainapp
It should tell you what mainapp can see.

You probably need to put the directory containing libSequential.so in LD_LIBRARY_PATH. If you're using HPUX-10, it is LIBPATH.

Are you thinking of GUI, Web, embedded or console applications?

Self modifying executables are quite dangerous: most systems do not allow it. The main problem is that there are checksums embedded in the executable. If you don't patch them correctly, it stops...

Try the (LPCTSTR) or (LPCSTR) operator


HWND closer = FindWindow(NULL, (LPCSTR) closepath);

Guess I'm about 5 years behind - comes from maintaining legacy code where things still have to be done the old fashioned, clunky way.

Have a look at http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cs/unmanagedtomanaged.aspx for starters.

Normally you need a whole load of interface wrappers which are just one liners and quite tedious to write but...

Why do you need to do this? Why not either write everything in C# or everything in C++?

I'd imagine you can only do this in managed C++. Are you trying it in managed or unmanaged C++?

Just a long shot. Compile as position independent code and use gcc or g++ to do the linking

Changes

CFLAGS=-g -Wall $(INCLUDE) -fPIC
LDFLAGS=-shared
LD=gcc

It is something I've noticed...

Change


120: static simple_ptr<T> s_pObject;
121: static char s_objectState = 0;

to


120: extern simple_ptr<T> s_pObject;

Why not just use hash_compare. Have you had a look at the examples?

You could try FLTK. It doesn't have stacked barcharts: only ordinary barcharts but it does come with source code and a nice set of test programs which you can use as starting points, though the...

If you don't get any suitable responses, it might be worth trying the database forum http://www.codeguru.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=51

I disagree - I think Unicode is a lot simpler than MBCS. Not as simple as SBCS but definitely simpler than MBCS. If by MBCS, you meant SBCS then ignore what I've said.

For instance, how do you...