December 12th, 2008 12:48 PM
Some comments on the previous posts - mostly in reverse order
template typedefs - while this is relatively simple to implement we felt that it just didn't provide as much value as the features we...
December 10th, 2008 03:55 PM
There is one change that fell out of the implementaion of rvalue references that has broken some code bases internally. It is code like the following:
December 10th, 2008 03:26 PM
When we started the Dev10 planning process 'nullptr' was still under active discussion by the C++ Committee (it is funny how sometimes the smallest features can take up so much time) and we didn't...
December 10th, 2008 02:30 PM
Ah: this feature is officially known as "late specified return type" and it will be supported in Dev10. What I understand by "alternate function syntax" was a proposal to unify the syntax used for...
December 10th, 2008 02:19 PM
This has not yet been finalized -- but I suspect it won't be much different from what Visual C++ 2008 requires.
December 10th, 2008 12:11 PM
Here's my answer:
YES - Rvalue reference and move semantics
No - Generalized constant expressions
No - Modification to the definition of plain old data
YES- Extern template (note: we have...