i never heard anythin
cherish did not say anythin...neither did i hear anythin nada !! nada!!
- Sreehari
"Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us."
" Everybody is sent to Earth on a purpose. I am so Lagging behind that i won't die." – Calvin
This is me taken some 6 months back. Face a little bit distorted with some thing black around my mouth . I am known to belong to the non-photogenic category too.
that was close !! now i can lead a peaceful and happy life with my wife and kids ( future wife and kids tho )
- Sreehari
"Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us."
" Everybody is sent to Earth on a purpose. I am so Lagging behind that i won't die." – Calvin
This may sound strange, but some people find an individual photogenic, while others don't.
I agree.
"Good looks" by itself is not only subjective across people, but also subjective across time / eras. For instance, many of us would find the actresses of the 60s looking pretty (and) dated what with their outdated dressing style and hair-style. They may not come across as "photogenic" today - even though at the peak of their careers they were outstandingly so.
Originally Posted by cherish
And ofcourse, for one to determine if a person is photogenic: they should have had the chance to see that individual both in person and in photos, for comparison. I am speaking strictly about "visual appeal" in this case.
Yes, but in this case - the visually appealing person may not really be "photogenic" in the true sense. i.e As the individuals have met in person, the subject's "likeability" (or "charisma" as Guido put it) has influenced the opinion of the viewer making the judgement.
So, it is more likely that another viewer may disagree with the former's opinion.
Yes, but in this case - the visually appealing person may not really be "photogenic" in the true sense. i.e As the individuals have met in person, the subject's "likeability" (or "charisma" as Guido put it) has influenced the opinion of the viewer making the judgement.
True. But when I said "strictly visual appeal" I am talking about how the subject's appearance registered in the photo. But then of course, beauty/appeal is in the eyes of the beholder. Again, I am talking strictly about photos here...
Bookmarks