-
January 6th, 2009, 01:59 AM
#1
Windows free vs checked edition problems
I've managed to make a checked/debug version of windows xp by integrating a checked version of service pack 2 into free edition of windows XP sp1a. It works ok, gives some "invalid handle" info in WinDBG.
My driver installs OK on free edition, but on this made-checked version i get "PipCallDriverAddDevice: Unable to reference driver \ Driver\... " error with status "couldn't start driver"..
Is it posible? i mean that it works on a free edition and doesn't on checked? or this way of obtaining the checked version isn't good after all?
-
January 6th, 2009, 08:04 AM
#2
Re: Windows free vs checked edition problems
To the best of my knowledge (it has been a while), you need to be consistent with using checked-build vs. normal builds. I have always applied checked service-packs to checked baseline installs, and have never had a problem.
Differences in compiler/linker settings can easily make structures different, etc. The range of potential problems is enormous.
TheCPUWizard is a registered trademark, all rights reserved. (If this post was helpful, please RATE it!)
2008, 2009,2010
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice; in practice there is.
* Join the fight, refuse to respond to posts that contain code outside of [code] ... [/code] tags. See here for instructions
* How NOT to post a question here
* Of course you read this carefully before you posted
* Need homework help? Read this first
-
January 7th, 2009, 06:23 AM
#3
Re: Windows free vs checked edition problems
There's a problem that i'm not able to get a "normal" checked version. I can't afford msdn subscription. And i'm still pretty stuck on previous questions in another topic.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|