-
December 12th, 2011, 08:07 PM
#1
What version of the .NET framework do you recommend for mass use?
Basically, my program does not install, as it is dire that there are no external dependencies, so there is no way to install frameworks if the consumer does not have .NET 4.x. I only have experience working with version 4.0 so I'm not sure if it would be detrimental to downgrade to, say, version 2.0 for the sake of supporting older systems. My program establishes network connections and installs proprietary hardware hooks. Will v2.0 support this just as well as v4.0?
-
December 12th, 2011, 08:58 PM
#2
Re: What version of the .NET framework do you recommend for mass use?
Short answer: "Probably". Longer answer: "Probably, but test it first."
Best Regards,
BioPhysEngr
http://blog.biophysengr.net
--
All advice is offered in good faith only. You are ultimately responsible for effects of your programs and the integrity of the machines they run on.
-
December 12th, 2011, 09:12 PM
#3
Re: What version of the .NET framework do you recommend for mass use?
A slightly longer answer: "It's pretty much all built on top of 2.0 (which might be somewhat less true for the upcoming version), so - probably, with some extra work; but test it first."
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|