My 'Wild' guess would be that beyond 64 tables, DTS can't keep proper track anymore of relations in the database properly and gets confused as to which table to import first.
It could also be that the designers decided that beyond 64 tables, performance would degrade beyond anything usefull if DTS had to keep track of everything. Or it's more along the lines of.. nobody in their right mind would build a database where there are more than 64 tables that are all interlinked in some manner and have to be imported together for relational integrity to be preserved. ( 640K ought to be enough for everybody... )
( and no, I didn't read what's on that post you linked, can't access it due to restrictions on my internet activities at work to limit my internet addiction )
This is not exactly large for an Accounting / CRM / ERP system
NONE of the tables are interlinked so there are no relational integrity issues.
Anyway, if this would be the case then the limit would be on the number of relationships, not number of tables
All I want to do is create a SQL Server Database from my Access database.
Its just that the designers at Microsoft have built in a restriction of 64 tables
Why 64 ? Why not 32 ? Why not 66 ? Why not 128 ?
Main thing is that I found the solution and am passing it on so that some other unsuspecting soul wont be hunting for a ghost as I was
Why didn't they just say "Dont import more than 64 Tables"
There was a warning at the beginning of the import that it "may" be advisable to restrict the number of tables being imported but NO WAY did it specify a limit of 64.
* The Best Reasons to Target Windows 8
Learn some of the best reasons why you should seriously consider bringing your Android mobile development expertise to bear on the Windows 8 platform.