View Poll Results: Do you design for Parallel Processing?
- Voters
- 14. You may not vote on this poll
-
Yes, and I have for more than 2 years
-
Yes, and I have for more than 1 year
-
Yes, and I have for more than 6 months
-
No, but I plan to start
-
No, I dont know how
-
What is Parallel Processing
-
December 11th, 2008, 09:51 AM
#6
Re: Today is the day most software turned to "garbage"...
Thank you for your answer.
But as I understand, Parallel Extensions library will be available for .NET platform. And what about native applications?
My main point is that I think, there should be transparent, implicit support for parallel processing provided by environment used by developer. I think that it would be good thing that i.e. when I make a call to some asynchronous WinAPI function, it is automagically executed on least utilized core. Or when I use some GUI library (let it be MFC, wxWidgets, anything), it processes messages, calls handlers and paints after picking the best (least used?) CPU. I think that these are library providers who shuold think how to make their code cope well with multicore systems, not me.
You ask in your survey whether I design for parallel processing. My answer is: should I? Of course, sometimes I should, when performing paralellizable calculations etc. But in general case, should not it be components designed for parallel processing? Then, each desktop application created by me would efficiently use multiple CPUs without any effor from my side.
I hope you understand my point, I feel that I did not express myself clear enough, but I can't better...
B+!
'There is no cat' - A. Einstein
Use [code] [/code] tags!
Did YOU share your photo with us at CG Members photo gallery ?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|