difference between polymorphism and overloading

[heights]

Well, you got the gist didn't you.

C++ programmers usually have a quite limited outlook of what constitutes polymorphism. A broader view requires you to consider type systems and then there are four basic forms of polymorphism namely coersion, overloading, inclusion and parametric.

With this information you can safely go on learning C++ enjoying the benefits of a very polymorphic type system. What's been said in this thread will become clear to you eventually. Good luck.

Thank you for the luck!

Regards
H

[ahoodin]

C++ programmers usually have a quite limited outlook of what constitutes polymorphism.

Must be having another senior moment.

[nuzzle]

Must be having another senior moment.

Yes sometimes you forget that you never knew.

[ahoodin]

Nope it would be you. You are the Senior member who forgets how to behave and has the senior moments. And I mean plural, because you have had many of them over the past year. You think that you can just blurt anything out about C++ programmers. It is you who have the limited view of C++ programmers. You with the smart allec comments, and you who needs to learn manners.

[nuzzle]

Nope it would be you. You are the Senior member who forgets how to behave and has the senior moments. And I mean plural, because you have had many of them over the past year. You think that you can just blurt anything out about C++ programmers. It is you who have the limited view of C++ programmers. You with the smart allec comments, and you who needs to learn manners.

Thank you for expanding my view on C++ programmers. Always well-mannered and never a senior moment right. Maybe I should ask one for a date. You don't happen to be ...

But that won't change the facts. The predominant usage of the term polymorphism in the C++ community is limited compared with how it's used in the broader context of type systems.

[ahoodin]

Are those really your professional ideas? Awesome, Wow!
Simply Brilliant. Your nothing but a common Troll.

[nuzzle]

Are those really your professional ideas? Awesome, Wow!
Simply Brilliant. Your nothing but a common Troll.

Mind your manners. Use arguments not defamating comments.

It's not an idea, it's an observation. This is very typical,

http://www.cplusplus.com/doc/tutorial/polymorphism/

I quote,

"One of the key features of derived classes is that a pointer to a derived class is type-compatible with a pointer to its base class. Polymorphism is the art of taking advantage of this simple but powerful and versatile feature, that brings Object Oriented Methodologies to its full potential."

My emphasis. Sometimes also the mechanism of overloading is included in the concept of polymorphism and contrasted with the above and you get the "static vs. dynamic" distinction.

Ask a C++ programmer about polymorphism and the above is the answer you're most likely to get. I'm not saying it's wrong or bad. But it's a limited view of what constitutes polymorphism.

[Joeman]

Some go even further and consider polymorphism to be synonymous with the C++ virtual method dispatch mechanism

This is because of the c++ standard. The only type of polymorphic behavior that goes by its direct effect is class polymorphism

but that won't change the facts. The predominant usage of the term polymorphism in the C++ community is limited compared with how it's used in the broader context of type systems.

That is because c++ doesn't have another terminology for class polymorphism and therefore is typically referred to as polymorphism in general. I surely know how to use other types of polymorphism. The only thing I have to know is the c++ terminology when dealing with c++. So I go by c++ terminology like type casting since this is what the c++ standard goes by and not polymorphic coercion. So yes I know polymorphic coercion, inclusion polymorphism( aka subtype ), ad-hoc polymorphism, parametric polymorphism and whatever else is polymorphic in c++ by its terminology in c++.

I quote,

"One of the key features of derived classes is that a pointer to a derived class is type-compatible with a pointer to its base class. Polymorphism is the art of taking advantage of this simple but powerful and versatile feature, that brings Object Oriented Methodologies to its full potential."
..................
Ask the average C++ programmer about polymorphism and the above is the answer you get. I'm not saying it's wrong. But it's a limited view of what constitutes polymorphism.

c++ is oop and that is what c++ mandates as polymorphism directly

Virtual functions support dynamic binding and object-oriented programming. A class that declares or
inherits a virtual function is called a polymorphic class.

So it does make since to use c++ terminology directly and not necessary how polymorphism applies to every part of the language in general.

[nuzzle]

So it does make since to use c++ terminology directly and not necessary how polymorphism applies to every part of the language in general.

Sure. Other languages do the same.

But the OP found it confusing and I thought he may benefit from the broader picture and not just the common C++ view only.

[laserlight]

It's not an idea, it's an observation.

I observe that my post #12 and Lindley's post #13 did not get ahoodin so riled up, probably because I used "we (...) in C++", Lindley spoke about "C++", and we made objective statements about what is the norm with respect to C++, rather than use a phrase like "quite limited outlook" to contrast with "broader view" that can be intepreted as an aspersion on "C++ programmers" as a group from which you are trying to dissociate yourself. I doubt that these were your intentions, but phrased as such, I can see why ahoodin felt you were trolling.

I thought he may benefit from the broader picture and not just the common C++ view only.

I agree.

[TheGreatCthulhu]

[directed @ nuzzle] You think that you can just blurt anything out about C++ programmers.

Lol. From my experience, nuzzle has a habit of defending C++, funny that you now put him in the "other camp". XD

Must be having another senior moment.

Sure, we've all seen that nuzzle has his moments, but I think you're just overreacting to his comment - which wasn't particularly offensive, or ill-tempered. As far as I know nuzzle is a C++ programmer himself, at least among other things.

It's good to have a more brother view of things, and specifically in this case, we all can agree that the idea of polymorphism is not something language-specific.
Yes, you may never need to deal with it outside the context of C++, but it is important to make the distinction between what it fundamentally is, and how it manifests itself in the language mechanisms of C++. Then you can realize that it doesn't have to stop there, and that having this broader view will make you a better programmer, and it just might come in handy some day, when thinking out of the box is required.

[Joeman]

I agree knowing how things work and why is important. That is why I like computers in the first place They are quite complicated.

[nuzzle]

I can see why ahoodin felt you were trolling.

Sure, even in the most polite and correct C++ professional lurks a hooligan ready to strike out on the slightest hint his subculture is attacked.

Help, I did it again didn't I

[laserlight]

Help, I did it again didn't I

Don't blame me if ahoodin zaps you with a laser, or more likely polymorphs you into a sheep

[ahoodin]

Sure, even in the most polite and correct C++ professional lurks a hooligan ready to strike out on the slightest hint his subculture is attacked.

Help, I did it again didn't I

That was senior moment 1736. You might want to keep your day job because standup just isn't your thing.