Re: "Qt" or "boost" threads?
Personally, I prefer POSIX. It's old, written in C, and very stable and very fast.
Re: "Qt" or "boost" threads?
I'd suggest Boost Threads, since they're most similar to what C++0x Standard Threads will look like once those are supported. (I don't think any current compilers support them yet.)
Re: "Qt" or "boost" threads?
Boost allows to create threads in any executable or library, it doesn't natter whether it exposes some UI functions or not. Any non-trivial project contains executables and libraries. In main executable working with Qt, you may use both Qt and Boost threads. In helper non-UI libraries you need Boost threads. Generally, in such case it is better to use Boost threads always.
Re: "Qt" or "boost" threads?
Hello,
Thank you for the good answers,I will probably use the boost library
MIchael.