overload

the operator+ and operator^ are not working. Can anyone correct?.

Code:

---

#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>

using namespace std;

template <class T>
class Array2D
{
    T* data;
    int w, h;
public:
    Array2D(int X, int Y) : w(X), h(Y)
    {
        data = new T[w*h];
    }
 
    ~Array2D()
    {
        if (data != NULL)
        {
            delete [] data;
            data = NULL;
        }
    }
 
    T& operator ()(int Col, int Row)
    {
        return data[Row*w+Col];
    }
 
    Array2D operator+( Array2D& m)
    {
        int w = m.width();
        int h = m.height();
        Array2D theArray2D(w,h);
        for (int r=0;r<h;r++)
        {
            for (int c=0;c<w;c++)
            {
                theArray2D(c,r)=data[c*w+r]+m(c,r);
            }
        }
        return theArray2D;
    }

    Array2D operator^( cont T& t)
    {
      //need to be filled
    }

    int width()
    {return w;}
 
    int height()
    {return h;}

};

int main( )
{
    int c = 5;
    int r = 6;

    Array2D<int> b(c,r);
    Array2D<int> b1(c,r);

    for(int j=0; j<r; j++)
    {
        for(int i=0; i<c; i++)
        {
            b(i,j) = i+j;
            b1(i,j) = i+j;
        }
    }

  Array2D<int> a1 = b + b1;
    Array2D<int> a2 = b ^ 2;

    for(int j=0; j<r; j++)
    {
        for(int i=0; i<c; i++)
        {
            std::cout << a1(i,j) << "\t";
        }
        std::cout << "\n";
    }

    return 0;
}

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CHO

the operator+ and operator^ are not working. Can anyone correct?.

---

What do you mean by "not working"?

Secondly, for what reason are you overloading operator ^? If you're overloading it to do powers -- forget it. The "^" precedence level is incompatible with it being used for power operations.

Regards,

Paul McKenzie

these are the results from a1(i,j) , operator+.::eek:

-572662307 1 0 0 -33686019
-572662307 524295 786688 3233816 0
273774084 177 8 2 134
-33686019 3232304 3232360 -33686019 -572662307
458778 -572719104 3211848 3211848 -572662307
-572662307 -572662307 -572662307 -572662307 -572662307

How do i overload power?.:confused:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CHO

these are the results from a1(i,j) , operator+.::eek:

-572662307 1 0 0 -33686019
-572662307 524295 786688 3233816 0
273774084 177 8 2 134
-33686019 3232304 3232360 -33686019 -572662307
458778 -572719104 3211848 3211848 -572662307
-572662307 -572662307 -572662307 -572662307 -572662307

---

Before asking one of us to debug your code, have you debugged your code? Every programmer makes mistakes, and debugging your own code is part and parcel of learning how to program.

Quote:

---

How do i overload power?.:confused:

---

You don't. You write a function to do it.

Notice that C++ has a pow() function, and does not use ^ for powers for the reasons I described.

Regards,

Paul McKenzie

made it working!!!!

value of b1 changes after the + operation. Tried to prevent that , but no luck.

Code:

---

#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>

using namespace std;

template <class T>
class Array2D
{
    T* data;
    int w, h;
public:
    Array2D(int X, int Y) : w(X), h(Y)
    {
        data = new T[w*h];
    }
 
    ~Array2D()
    {
        if (data != NULL)
        {
            delete [] data;
            data = NULL;
        }
    }
 
    T& operator ()(int Col, int Row)
    {
        return data[Row*w+Col];
    }
 
    Array2D<T>& operator+( Array2D<T>& m)
    {
                //Array2D<int> c(w,h);

                //Array2D<int>& result = c;

        Array2D& result = m;
        for (int r=0;r<h;r++)
        {
            for (int c=0;c<w;c++)
                        {
                                result(c,r) = (*this)(c,r)+m(c,r);
                        }
                }
                return result;
    }

    int width()
    {return w;}
 
    int height()
    {return h;}

};

int main( )
{
    int c = 5;
    int r = 6;

    Array2D<int> b(c,r);
    Array2D<int> b1(c,r);

    for(int j=0; j<r; j++)
    {
        for(int i=0; i<c; i++)
        {
            b(i,j) = 2;
            b1(i,j) = 1;
        }
    }

    //value of b1 changes after this line. Tried to prevent that , but no luck.
    Array2D<int>& a1 = b + b1;

    for(int j=0; j<r; j++)
    {
        for(int i=0; i<c; i++)
        {
            std::cout << a1(i,j) << "\t";
        }
        std::cout << "\n";
    }

    return 0;
}

---

made a change:

Code:

---

    Array2D<T>& operator+( Array2D<T>& m)
    {
                Array2D<int> *n = new Array2D<int>(w,h);

                Array2D<int>& result = *n;
        for (int r=0;r<h;r++)
        {
            for (int c=0;c<w;c++)
                        {
                                result(c,r) = (*this)(c,r)+m(c,r);
                        }
                }
                return result;
    }

---

it works now. if there is a better way to do this, let me know.

1. I see a "new" , but no delete. You will have a memory leak

2. You do memory allocation. You will need to code up a proper
copy constructor and assignment operator

3. Normally, you do not make operator + a member variable.
You make operator += a member (returning a reference to *this

4. You make operator + a non member function, coded in terms
of operator += and the copy constructor.

I am new to operator overloading. If anyone can make the changes to the class and the main(), to see, it be useful.

Here is an example (non templated ... "1D" array).

I did not check everything ... but this will give you an idea ...

Code:

---

#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>

using namespace std;

class Array
{   
  int * pArray;
 
  int size;
 
public:
   
  Array(int dim = 10) : size(dim)
  {
    pArray = new int [size];
  }
 
  Array (const Array & rhs)
  {
    pArray = new int [rhs.size];
    size = rhs.size;
   
    for (int i=0; i<size; ++i)
    {
      pArray[i] = rhs.pArray[i];
    }
  }
 
  void Swap (Array & rhs) throw ()
  {
    std::swap(size,rhs.size);
    std::swap(pArray,rhs.pArray);
  }
 
  Array & operator = (const Array & rhs)
  {
    Array temp(rhs);
    Swap(temp);
    return *this;
  }
 
  Array & operator += (const Array & rhs)
  {
    if (size > rhs.size)
    {
      // you need to decide what to do here
    }
    else
    {
      for (int i=0; i<size; ++i)
      {
        pArray[i] += rhs.pArray[i];
      }
    }
   
    return *this;
  }
 
  size_t Size() { return size; }
 
  const int & operator [] (int i) const
  {
    return pArray[i];
  }
 
  int & operator [] (int i)
  {
    return pArray[i];
  }
 
  ~Array()
  {
    delete [] pArray;
  }
};

Array operator + (const Array & lhs , const Array & rhs)
{
  Array temp(lhs);
  return temp += rhs;
}

int main()
{
  Array a(3);
  Array b(3);
  Array c(3);
 
  for (int i=0; i<a.Size(); ++i)
  {
    a[i] = 1;
    b[i] = 6;
  }
 
  c = a + b;
 
  for (int i=0; i<c.Size(); ++i)
  {
    cout << c[i] << "\n";
  }
 
  return 0;
}

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CHO

made a change:

Code:

---

    Array2D<T>& operator+( Array2D<T>& m)
    {
                Array2D<int> *n = new Array2D<int>(w,h);

                Array2D<int>& result = *n;
        for (int r=0;r<h;r++)
        {
            for (int c=0;c<w;c++)
                        {
                                result(c,r) = (*this)(c,r)+m(c,r);
                        }
                }
                return result;
    }

---

it works now. if there is a better way to do this, let me know.

---

operator+ should not change either argument, therefore it should return an object that is neither of the arguments i.e. it should not return a reference, but a new object, like philip has shown.

1) You can eliminate the necessity of a copy constructor/assignment operator by using std::vector instead of a C-style array.

2) binary operators (i.e. operator+) should be implemented as non-member functions.