Being a responsible man, you will realize that it is not acceptable to stay put just to one side.
Is this thread a joke thread ? YES.
are my words jokes or incorrect to you ? You think.
Printable View
Being a responsible man, you will realize that it is not acceptable to stay put just to one side.
Is this thread a joke thread ? YES.
are my words jokes or incorrect to you ? You think.
Please post jokes that are acceptable to everybody. See the AUP for the rules.
I agree, Username555, should promise that he will change, not to jeke people around,
Why did the golfer wear two pairs of trousers?
Incase he had a hole in one.
...
Sorry, I really couldn't resist.
Every morning, I put on my underwear to run around the house, no one cares. True.
http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/1720/15638865rw6.png
Hi all,
This thread has been dead for some time, but I just found it, and want to share with you a joke, hopefully not published here yet.
As this is programming forum, this is a joke about a programmer.
Programmer's wife ask him to go shopping.
She says: "Buy a dozen of eggs, and if there are sausages, buy five"
He goes to the shop, and asks the clerk :
"Do you have sausages ?"
"Yes" answers the clerk.
"ok, so I'll take five eggs"
:)
Pawel.
I didn't know that one, it's probably new. :)
LOL I love that one, awesome.
Just a translation for nerds:
if(ShopHasSausages = TRUE) Buy("Eggs", 5);
else Buy("Eggs", 12);
//VirtualProgrammer's Industries 2009-2009
Haha :D, just tryin to pull my own one here.
EDIT - (Corrected code :) and administered copyright).
Though if he follows the algorithm sequentially, he could by 17 eggs rather than 5:
Buy("Eggs", 12);
if(ShopHas("Sausages") == TRUE)
{
Buy("Eggs", 5);
}
:)
Basically, spoken language is really badly defined. We should stop using it and talk proper and clear algorithms... :rolleyes:
Using hard coded string literals and magic numbers in code isn't good practice.
As such, this isn't even close to funny.
Oh my god! How did I forget the 12 eggs. ****. LOL anyway, nice correction there, and yeah I completely agree... languages are horrifically defined. But talking in expressions won't be interesting :D.
Arjay man no need to be so stuck up now is there? :(. Just relax.
EDIT - I did not swear... I think... See below post for further explanation. :).
Getting around our fine word filter is also against the AUP. May I suggest that you edit your post before it gets quoted...
What do you mean? Is that word a bad one? Really? Anyway I'll change it... but I didn't know I was in the wrong. Sorry.
If it gets filtered, that means one of two things. 1) Filter mistake, but not likely after a few years running, and 2) It has a reason to be.Quote:
Originally Posted by VirtualProgrammer
Either way, you have to ask a moderator if it's #1 BEFORE you use it. They've been known to add corrections.