Printable View
Maybe, maybe not. I told you whats I'm interested in. I'm interested if you do what we are trying to teach you. I cannot see this in an exe file. Not to ope an exe written by a foreign is a basic principle I use since years. I also dont download unknown other software if it isn't common known to be a good, well known product.Quote:
Originally Posted by dahwan
So whats with your promises ? You are very quick coming back to your bad habits my dear, giving the wrong not expected antagonistic answers likeThis is the most stupid justification I ever heard. zipping this small amount of files is soem few minutes only as you know. how much time do we spend to teach you ???:mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by dahwan
Remember: in post #139 you wroteSo do whats wanted or forget to come to here,Quote:
Originally Posted by dahwan
If you want help post your own thread and ask your question. Best way showing the codepart with which you are in troubles. Normally we are not offering help via email. Because reading Posts helps more then one people. email is only for one person.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicky Butt
well, in my 15 years i haven't been infected by any virus. Not trojan or anything. If you guys don't have anti virus programs and are to stubborn to try my program, at least I'll give you the source codes as soon as possible.
Attention.:Come down. One more of this sort of insuling comments and as CPUwiz told you, you will get banned here for everQuote:
Originally Posted by dahwan
thats not insulting. You are to stubborn = you wont change your mind.
Thats the program I've been developing
I think the point everyone here is trying to make is this:Quote:
Originally Posted by dahwan
1) You are new to C#
2) They are not
3) They know what good practices are
4) You do not.
5) You arent listening to what they are saying.
When someone says they won't run an exe from an unknown source, why are you trying to force them to? Running exe's from unknown sources is the best way of catching a virus/trojan. Standard practice is to post the code here, *not* exe's. Once agian, this is standard practice which you're ignoring because you know better (please see point 4 above).
Thing is, no-one is out to get you, or insult you, just trying to help. So all we're asking for is to get a bit more than just lip-service when we offer you advice. It'd be nice if you listened and took it on board.
Sorry this isn't what the dictionary says about stubborn. If you want to say that I didn't change my intention then say it exactly that way. stubborn in the maindefinition are a lot of german words and as you are a nordic you will understand them when I list it here:Quote:
Originally Posted by dahwan
stur, starrkoepfig,dickkoepfig, stoerrisch.. The example there says 'stuborn as a mule' So thats all to it. And it also notes to the word that it is used only in an invalidating manner. So dont try to permanently ignoring our rules and to invalidate your helpers when we, knowing the rules and using them, do not follow your attempts to ignore them, but insist on them. The rules have to be used, get it !
I'm really not trying to break any rules :(
Skandinavians might have other meanings of words than in america...
Here is the source files. Zipped with normal zip. I pasted in all the directories and files i thought were important.
I really hate it when you guys get mad at me :(
You still haven't taken on board the advice to not store your StreamReaders and Writers at the class level, but at the method level. You also haven't taken advantage of the "using()" pattern to guarantee the release of your unmanaged resources such as your StreamReaders and Writers...
changes toCode:SW = File.CreateText(saveResult.FileName);
SW.Write(txtbox1.Text);
SW.Close();
Also, you still haven't started naming your variables in an informative way. "SW" is hardly informative. I have no idea what "txtBox1" is, and neither will you in a months time.Code:using(StreamWriter writer = File.CreateText(saveResult.FileName))
writer.Write(txtbox1.Text);
dahwan ! Just as Mutant_Fruit said, there are no big changes in the way you are doing. Reread what we suggested in former posts, do it and come back to us.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutant_Fruit
Not at all. the scandinavian meaning of that word is just the same as the german and dont forget, I'm an Austrian, not an American, so I know a bit about European languages and translations, maybe more then you like. Whats about: norway: stivsinnet, german starrsinnig, or gjenstridig which is like german dickköpfig, english again stubborn, more exact pigheaded, or påståelig, sta or do you need swedish or dansk ? Dont forget this are all languages near to german only divergating some hundert years before. So forget your justifications.Quote:
Originally Posted by dahwan
Norwegian - English
stivsinnet = stiff-minded
sta = stubborn
Actually. That piece of code took me a lot to write. It took time, energy and the will to succeed ^^
If it still doesnt look good, it's a sign you are too pro to be helping a noob like myself...
I called you stubborn because i am trying to convince you that i'm not an evil hacker that wants to take controll over you'r PC's (^^P) and you won't budge. Thats stubbornness. And if in english "stubborn" is only a negative word then its diffrent in norwegian. We use stubborn as being hard to convince/true to what you believe in/wont budge. So it can be positive, negative or plain neutral; as i used it.
you are too stubborn to download my file;
you are absolutely impossible to convince to download my file;
i want you do download my file, but you wont budge;
i don't mean it offencively !
Sorry for all of this :(
Fair play. You wrote a program. A lot of people give up trying to figure out for loops. You did better than most.Quote:
Originally Posted by dahwan
Now this i don't understand. You're saying that if your code doesn't look good, it's our fault for not helping you make it look good? What do you think we have been trying to do here? We've been trying to help you make it look good. You are the one who's not accepting the help. We've told you the rules, you haven't listened. We've offered advice, you've ignored it. You've insulted some people because they're "too pro" to help you, yet you seem to be "too pro" to accept help. In fact, this quote neatly wraps it up:Quote:
Originally Posted by dahwan
(please forgive the quote-editing, but it helps my point)
You can argue that some of what we're suggesting might possibly be considered overkill for this code, but unless you learn good practices and apply them *everywhere* you will screw up. If you applied that level of coding to a project which spans several dozen classes you'll find yourself in a mess of:Quote:
Originally Posted by dahwan
Code:// Check for invalid input
if(form1.textbox1.Text != form5.textbox51 && form51.textbox62.Text == form13.textbox23.Text.Substring(5, 10))
MessageBox.Show("Invalid input");