Most Costly Method [C#]

I dont care about he money :) I just enjoy doing it and having fun

Interesting topic even though I know nothing about C#. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RaleTheBlade

I dont care about he money I just enjoy doing it and having fun

---

Good attitude! I wish I could find a programming job but I'm only in my first year of uni. :(

Quote:

---

I dont care about he money I just enjoy doing it and having fun

---

You're obviously not married and have no children then... :D

Darwen.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by darwen

You're obviously not married and have no children then... :D

Darwen.

---

Nope, lol. I was thinking about something today though. If that method had to be implemented, why not just make the prototype in an interface and then implement the interface to force the class to conform?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mybowlcut

Interesting topic even though I know nothing about C#. :)

Good attitude! I wish I could find a programming job but I'm only in my first year of uni. :(

---

Wishing doesn't make dreams come true my friend, you have to get out there in the mix and show the man that you want it!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheCPUWizard

If a mistake costs $3 million dollars (yes, actual amount), then SOMEONE is going to lose their job.

---

The person who failed to do the code review? ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by darwen

You're obviously not married and have no children then... :D

---

There are plenty of people who have wife/kids and earn a lot less than a software developer.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheCPUWizard

Consider the following:

Code:

---

public class SomeClass()
{
  protected virtual void SpecialWorkerMethod()
  {
      throw new Exception("Derived Class must Implement this Method");
  }
}

---

---

Another problem with that approach:

Isn't it generally good practice to call the base class implementation in the derived implementation?

I'm think of Form.OnLoad, for example.

So if you did that, the base base class implementation would throw that exception!