splitting a string

lol I can get it down to 3 lines inside a function, but no one liner :(. Perhaps 2

I should've said "a single line of statement" instead of just saying a single line.
My one liner spans across the screen little too much
So I'm sure your 2 lines is as good as mine, if not better. :)

lol here is my code ;)

Code:

---

void Tokenize( const string& TokenString, vector< string >& Tokens, char Delimiter = '$' )
{
    string Token;
    stringstream TokenSplitter( TokenString );
    while( getline( TokenSplitter, Token, Delimiter ) ) Tokens.push_back( Token );
}

---

and this is how you use it

Code:

---

vector<string> Tokens;
Tokenize( "1 2$3$4\n5$6", Tokens );

---

I think that is 3 statements :rolleyes: enjoy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Joeman

I think that is 3 statements :rolleyes: enjoy

---

That's great :)
Mine can be used if there's no luxury of affording 3 statements :p

Code:

---

void Chunkify(const string& s, vector<string>& v, unsigned int p = 0, char delim = '$')
{
    return string::npos != (p = s.find(delim)) ? v.push_back(s.substr(0, p)), Chunkify(s.substr(p + 1), v, p) : v.push_back(s);
}

---

and can be used with a similar function call as yours

Code:

---

vector<string> Tokens;
Chunkify( "1 2$3$4\n5$6", Tokens );

---

But as I said before, I'm sure yours is better :)

lol nice one :) That is some way of doing it

I suppose you can take out that return keyword in your function?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Joeman

I think that is 3 statements

---

Four, depending on your point of view. But you probably should have let farooq124in try it first.

I am not complaining since farooq124in did try enough and it is only so little of code. It isn't 100 lines of unique code :)

You will notice I didn't include headers for a reason

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Joeman

You will notice I didn't include headers for a reason

---

Heheh :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Joeman

I suppose you can take out that return keyword in your function?

---

Haha of course! 98% of the time!
I just left it there to help improve what little purpose there is to indicate that the function is recursive :)