C++ fun: obfuscated "Hello world!"

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Mick_2002
Standards are for those that can't think outside of the box so they must impose a think inside of this box :)

---

Yez, breakc alll stantarhtz :D

Yeh, but this good words are more appropriate for thinking processes and boundaries of mind.
Sees like that: Knowledges are the baggage of prejudices and false introductions which we get.

As I remember Albert Einstein said something like this, that sometimes scientists cannot solve some non-ordinal problem and than some "ignoramus" comes and solves it, because he have not baggage of knowledges wich donot let him to go out of boudaries of mind them set and find non-ordinal solution.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by dimm_coder
Yez, breakc alll stantarhtz :D

Yeh, but this good words are more appropriate for thinking processes and boundaries of mind.
Sees like that: Knowledges are the baggage of prejudices and false introductions which we get.

As I remember Albert Einstein said something like this, that sometimes scientists cannot solve some non-ordinal problem and than some "ignoramus" comes and solves it, because he have not baggage of knowledges wich donot let him to go out of boudaries of mind them set and find non-ordinal solution.

---

Yes but who so more becomes the 'ignoramus'? The genius that thinks outside of the box or those that are confined to the box.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Mick_2002
Yes but who so more becomes the 'ignoramus'? The genius that thinks outside of the box or those that are confined to the box.

---

'ignoramus' here of course in metaphorical sense,
means that it is sometimes difficult to think outside of the box ,
when U have a 'baggage of adopted knowledges' that holds U in this box.
So the 2 main things of scientist (or someone ) are:

1) Hm... knowledges
2) Free fly of mind ( so this donot give U to stick in a box of common knowledges and let to go outside the box to find something new). This may be better called like - talent in some context.

Hm... may be I need to copyright those words :D
But, of course, this is well known thing.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Mick_2002
Stupid human trick, but execute Gal's code with a

int main()
{
<unknown> func;
throw 10101010;
return 0;
}

---

no one? Bueller? Bueller? Bueller? ok maybe that was too simplistic...or maybe you guys/gals just don't love me, I'm gonna go cry now.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Mick_2002
no one? Bueller? Bueller? Bueller? ok maybe that was too simplistic...or maybe you guys/gals just don't love me, I'm gonna go cry now.

---

Nah, my little squirrel brain can't figure out what its supposed to do. So, whats it supposed to do ?

Quote:

---

Originally posted by mdmd
Nah, my little squirrel brain can't figure out what its supposed to do. So, whats it supposed to do ?

---

Your suppose to call some <unnamed> function to "execute" gal's or anybodys code.. that's about it...I'd give it away if I say more...heh heh stupid human trick because 'most' people can't run this in the debugger....ok that's enough stupid human clues

EDIT: sorry lets say in main() none of gal's code is executed...now that's reallly giving it away...

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Mick_2002
Your suppose to call some <unnamed> function to "execute" gal's or anybodys code.. that's about it...I'd give it away if I say more...heh heh stupid human trick because 'most' people can't run this in the debugger....ok that's enough stupid human clues

EDIT: sorry lets say in main() none of gal's code is executed...now that's reallly giving it away...

---

the sound of MDMDs brain trying to figue this out :D Ner mind;
I'll go make a dialog box or something.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Kevin Hall
P.S. main() should return something. Probably 111111 from the looks of your app.

---

Of course not. That's a myth.

Mick, your comments are more obfuscated than anything I have yet seen on this thread. I humbly bow in awe.

SeventhStar, take that #define outta there. You're breaking the rules and you don't really need it (I really wanted to use #defines myself, but like the good sheep didn't). Also, as other's have mentioned, fix up the void.

And dimm_coder, I think you also assume ANSI (though I must say, I haven't been able to follow your code yet except to see its calculating on the thing it prints). Certainly this wins in a nonstandard obscurity contest, though.

By the way, as the slobbering dimwit once said, "this is cool." I'm looking forward to others. Props to Gabs. :eek:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by galathaea
Of course not. That's a myth.

Mick, your comments are more obfuscated than anything I have yet seen on this thread. I humbly bow in awe.

---

well you know...until a certain somebody posted code that a certain sombody was gonna post but a certain somebody already did (minus the complex) then a certain somebody got ADD...deals with recursion, bit swapping and the numbers 500 and 420...._d_a_m_n monkeys :) :) :)

EDIT: ahh the brain...I meant bit shifting...but really now folks think on what I've said...one <unknown> func and a throw...Paul would get this I think....but it goes to show how most people don't think about their programs...I kinda love them, I talk to them, touch them, tell them they are good programs, and how they will one day be the best program in the world....don't you : )

PS...gal and gab will have too say 'uncle' before I exposel this stupid STL trick...

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Mick_2003
well you know...until a certain somebody posted code that a certain sombody was gonna post but a certain somebody already did (minus the complex) then a certain somebody got ADD...deals with recursion, bit swapping and the numbers 500 and 420...._d_a_m_n monkeys

---

Hey, did someone say 420? I'll be back in a little while. Maybe then I'll get it....

You know, I ran this through Yves website link, http://www.comeaucomputing.com/tryitout/

And it's kinda stupid cause it doesn't understand set_term which is part of the STL..ahh well, please excuse me while I kiss the sky..

Code:

---

#include <iostream>
void eatmyshortswhilecallinggalscode()
{
        std::cout << "I would do nicole kidman";
        exit(0);
}
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
        set_terminate(eatmyshortswhilecallinggalscode);
    throw 10101010;
        return 0;
}

I guess I got bored enough to not wait for the doughnuts..

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by galathaea
Hey, did someone say 420? I'll be back in a little while. Maybe then I'll get it....

---

You are kidding of course? :) : ) :) 420 would be World...but maybe I'm just thinking a different way :)

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Mick_2002
You know, I ran this through Yves website link, http://www.comeaucomputing.com/tryitout/

And it's kinda stupid cause it doesn't understand set_term which is part of the STL..ahh well, please excuse me while I kiss the sky..

Code:

---

#include <iostream>
void eatmyshortswhilecallinggalscode()
{
        std::cout << "I would do nicole kidman";
        exit(0);
}
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
        set_terminate(eatmyshortswhilecallinggalscode);
    throw 10101010;
        return 0;
}

I guess I got bored enough to not wait for the doughnuts..

---

---

Mick, you do seem to have a problem lately... Or do you just want to see how far you can get?

Hmm, I think I still don't get it.....