Re: Transition from non-visual to visual
Quote:
Originally Posted by darwen
At any rate my vote firmly goes for MFC. It's not perfect, but is pretty good at what it does.
Exactly. MFC might not be a textbook example for perfect OO design - but it serves it's purpose very well: Creating real-world applications.
Quote:
Originally Posted by darwen
If you want a really nice language to write UI in use C#. I wouldn't write anything in C++.NET if I were you : it's like banging your head against a brick wall.
If you mean the managed extensions from VC++ 7.x here, you're right. However, with C++/CLI and VC++ 8.x, things will change notably. As for C#: Microsoft is currently positioning it against Java as a rather "academic" language - with C++ remaining the language of choice for real-world, industry-strength applications.