for the dog sake!!!:D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thecomputerprogrammer

How can someone somehow doubt?

---

I just did. :D
Or, is that grammatically wrong? :confused:

Quote:

---

somehow

adv 1: in some unspecified way or manner; or by some unspecified means; "they managed somehow"; "he expected somehow to discover a woman who would love him"; "he tried to make is someway acceptable" [syn: someway, someways, in some way, in some manner] 2: for some unspecified reason; "It doesn't seem fair somehow"; "he had me dead to rights but somehow I got away with it"; "for some reason they didn't seem to match" [syn: for some reason]


Source: WordNet ® 2.0, © 2003 Princeton University

---

Well, anyways.. I wanted to believe you but still doubted, because you didn't sound so serious to me w/ that :D emoticon/smilie. That's all. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cherish

I just did. :D
Or, is that grammatically wrong? :confused:

---

Well if someone doubts something they have a reason to doubt, so under the definition, "2: for some unspecified reason" this is what I got: "For some unspecified reason I doubt that's the real reason."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cherish

Well, anyways.. I wanted to believe you but still doubted, because you didn't sound so serious to me w/ that :D emoticon/smilie. That's all. :)

---

I was :Ding at the last sentence, "And to let people know who to ignore (for those who want to ignore them-the ones who don't follow rules)."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thecomputerprogrammer

Well if someone doubts something they have a reason to doubt, so under the definition, "2: for some unspecified reason" this is what I got: "For some unspecified reason I doubt that's the real reason."

---

Well, no.. I wasn't doubting the fact that I have a reason to doubt. Look at the synonyms too. What I meant w/ "somehow" is something like this: On a scale of 1 to 10 (1=Fully Believe; 10=Fully Doubt), I rate your reason 8. For me, Somehow = not fully. So, I was not fully doubting you. But it's cool. I already voted. ;)

// I do see that "somehow" and "doubt" together in a sentence is redundancy, ergo grammatically wrong. :D Thanks for pointing that out. I learned something. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thecomputerprogrammer

I was :Ding at the last sentence, "And to let people know who to ignore (for those who want to ignore them-the ones who don't follow rules)."

---

I 'kinda knew that. Was just making sure.

What??? Take a look at this:

sangli
Junior Member
*
Last Activity: 12-31-1969 07:00 PM*
Offline

Join Date: 04-23-1999


I was looking at people's profiles, here's the link:
http://www.codeguru.com/forum/member.php?u=3000

Same thing here:

GL Hovis
Junior Member
*
Last Activity: 12-31-1969 07:00 PM*
Offline*

Join Date: 03-30-1999


http://www.codeguru.com/forum/member.php?u=1445

If you take enough speed or if you go fast enough, time will go backwards.

That doesn't make much sense.:confused:
But 1969??? I wonder if they had date problems back then?:confused:

I would like a moderator to explain this. :)

maybe because of the forum update...from what I know from the oldtimer here, this forum is not the same as the forum on 1999...so maybe when Brad update this forum, there's a slight Y2K bugs issues....:rolleyes:...

another theory is, the first '9' in 1999 had been turned upside down by a bugs codename: Max:D...thus resulting to 19'6'9....

another theroy: the admin forgot to initialize the 'last_act" variable...thus it throws garbage values to our faces..:p

another another theroy: this forum had been here since 1969...meanings, before there's internet age, CG had release its beta version...

or maybe CG is the pioneer of communicating medium between Neil Armstrong and the earth base when he went to the moon in 1969...he use this forum to debug or ask his spaceship programming errors:D...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mrRee

maybe because of the forum update...from what I know from the oldtimer here, this forum is not the same as the forum on 1999...so maybe when Brad update this forum, there's a slight Y2K bugs issues....:rolleyes:...
...

---

Really?
Well actually, I forgot there's no rules. No saying who's going to tell the truth. :)

I Would Like To Know, Why Most of The Moderators Have Their Photos As Their Avatar? Is It A Rule For Moderators Or Something?