This is the game for people who don't like rules.
It's called 'for the dog sake!!!:D'
I hope you like it!
Rules:
NONE
Printable View
This is the game for people who don't like rules.
It's called 'for the dog sake!!!:D'
I hope you like it!
Rules:
NONE
I have a resistor on my keyboard, I put one end of it to the Scroll Lock ky and the other end to the Pause/Break key, can somone point me what i'm doing wrong..?;)
It's simple just divide how old you are by the amount of volts that are going through the resistor, multiply that by the radius of the moon, subtract how old Abraham Lincoln was when he died, and look in the dictionary the word that you got.Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Payne
for the God sake, please zip up your zipper....everybody can see it and theyre puking all over the place!!!:D....
Do you like the game?Quote:
Originally Posted by mrRee
I named it what you said to!
bad boy!!!...bad boy!!!!!....*jumping-off-cliff*
Wow, you don't even know if I am Male/Female.Quote:
Originally Posted by mrRee
(of course there are no rules!)
I know this game is about fun and games, but
I prefer not to use the Lord's Name in vain -
just my opinion - Please don't think I'm being funny, or anything, as said it's just my opinion.
yes.. lets just be funny, witty and smart but lets just refrain from using names and terms that can refer to any religion.. that could be mocking to some of the members .. right guys :thumb:
the first time i saw this thread, i was reading sake as sa-ke.. so my first thought as a Gods' wine or something related to alcohol :D:o
does anyone know how to rename a thread?
iDo. ;)
For my part I don't like anyone belittling dogs, either :D :eek:
Contact technical support of your keyboard.Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Payne
How?Quote:
Originally Posted by cilu
Thread Tools > Edit Thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by thecomputerprogrammer
... :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by cilu
do I have one?Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc G
Uh... THANKYOU. No, not you, whoever renamed it.Quote:
Originally Posted by cilu
under thread tools it says:
Show Printable Version
Email this Page
Subscribe to this Thread
NO EDIT THREAD.
You must be able to because you are a moderater. :lol:
You should. Check the manual of your keyboard :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Max Payne
What? What did I say?Quote:
Originally Posted by cherish
Quote:
Originally Posted by cilu
Maybe because you are a Moderator.
The 'Edit Thread' button might be down there for you, but not me. So Cherish was probably laughing about you, thinking everyone can modify their thread.
...:lol:
Is 'No rules' a rule?
To my knowledge, regular members should be able to edit the title of the threads they have created. Perhaps I was wrong... ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by thecomputerprogrammer
Because, I was expecting that you would say you're a Moderator... but instead I found you showed the actual steps you did in changing the title of this thread. :lol: (Assuming that you did).Quote:
Originally Posted by cilu
thecomputerprogrammer is quite right, but I was not laughing at you. I just found your reply very funny, that's all. :D
// AFAIK, one can change the title when replying to a thread... but I wasn't aware one can change the title of the thread they created. :confused: Only moderators can do that. ;)
EDIT:
So what's the purpose of the poll (and of this thread) again? :D
You know, this :lol: emoticons looks to me like a sarcastic "yeah, yeah, sure...". Aparantly it means LOL. :confused: That's why I asked...Quote:
Originally Posted by cherish
To know whether people like rules or not.Quote:
So what's the purpose of the poll (and of this thread) again?
Not exactly, just to see how many programmers liked rules. And to let people know who to ignore (for those who want to ignore them-the ones who don't follow rules). :DQuote:
Originally Posted by cilu
Cherish = Sarcastic ?
I don't think so. She doesn't have it in her. :)
Clarification is always good. I should use this emoticon next time I LOL --> http://forums.codeguru.com/Quote:
Originally Posted by cilu
No offense, but I somehow doubt that's the real reason... :DQuote:
Originally Posted by thecomputerprogrammer
Really? Why thanks, dg.. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by dglienna
Everybody has the ability of being sarcastic. ;) And at least once in a while we all exibit that. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by david
How can someone somehow doubt?Quote:
Originally Posted by cherish
Well anyway the real reason was to see how many programmers liked rules.
I just did. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by thecomputerprogrammer
Or, is that grammatically wrong? :confused:Well, anyways.. I wanted to believe you but still doubted, because you didn't sound so serious to me w/ that :D emoticon/smilie. That's all. :)Quote:
somehow
adv 1: in some unspecified way or manner; or by some unspecified means; "they managed somehow"; "he expected somehow to discover a woman who would love him"; "he tried to make is someway acceptable" [syn: someway, someways, in some way, in some manner] 2: for some unspecified reason; "It doesn't seem fair somehow"; "he had me dead to rights but somehow I got away with it"; "for some reason they didn't seem to match" [syn: for some reason]
Source: WordNet ® 2.0, © 2003 Princeton University
Well if someone doubts something they have a reason to doubt, so under the definition, "2: for some unspecified reason" this is what I got: "For some unspecified reason I doubt that's the real reason."Quote:
Originally Posted by cherish
I was :Ding at the last sentence, "And to let people know who to ignore (for those who want to ignore them-the ones who don't follow rules)."Quote:
Originally Posted by cherish
Well, no.. I wasn't doubting the fact that I have a reason to doubt. Look at the synonyms too. What I meant w/ "somehow" is something like this: On a scale of 1 to 10 (1=Fully Believe; 10=Fully Doubt), I rate your reason 8. For me, Somehow = not fully. So, I was not fully doubting you. But it's cool. I already voted. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by thecomputerprogrammer
// I do see that "somehow" and "doubt" together in a sentence is redundancy, ergo grammatically wrong. :D Thanks for pointing that out. I learned something. ;)
I 'kinda knew that. Was just making sure.Quote:
Originally Posted by thecomputerprogrammer
What??? Take a look at this:
sangli
Junior Member
*
Last Activity: 12-31-1969 07:00 PM*
Offline
Join Date: 04-23-1999
I was looking at people's profiles, here's the link:
http://www.codeguru.com/forum/member.php?u=3000
Same thing here:
GL Hovis
Junior Member
*
Last Activity: 12-31-1969 07:00 PM*
Offline*
Join Date: 03-30-1999
http://www.codeguru.com/forum/member.php?u=1445
If you take enough speed or if you go fast enough, time will go backwards.
That doesn't make much sense.:confused:
But 1969??? I wonder if they had date problems back then?:confused:
I would like a moderator to explain this. :)
maybe because of the forum update...from what I know from the oldtimer here, this forum is not the same as the forum on 1999...so maybe when Brad update this forum, there's a slight Y2K bugs issues....:rolleyes:...
another theory is, the first '9' in 1999 had been turned upside down by a bugs codename: Max:D...thus resulting to 19'6'9....
another theroy: the admin forgot to initialize the 'last_act" variable...thus it throws garbage values to our faces..:p
another another theroy: this forum had been here since 1969...meanings, before there's internet age, CG had release its beta version...
or maybe CG is the pioneer of communicating medium between Neil Armstrong and the earth base when he went to the moon in 1969...he use this forum to debug or ask his spaceship programming errors:D...
Really?Quote:
Originally Posted by mrRee
Well actually, I forgot there's no rules. No saying who's going to tell the truth. :)
I Would Like To Know, Why Most of The Moderators Have Their Photos As Their Avatar? Is It A Rule For Moderators Or Something?