let's race!

Hi!

this thread is intended to keep you away from the "the last one to post on this thread wins"-thread.

here is the goal of the "race": the one, who finds the lowest number which doesn't produce any results on google, wins! :D

(i hope i don't get in trouble with google for that :ehh: at least, please don't use any scripts or the like to make automated queries to the search engine, they don't allow that, and besides that, it would make this an unfair race!)

:wave: leo

Let's start:

69694281

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by reset-leo

here is the goal of the "race": the one, who finds the lowest number which doesn't produce any results on google, wins! :D

---

LOL! Hm, are hex numbers allowed, too? ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gstercken

LOL! Hm, are hex numbers allowed, too? ;)

---

well, no. i'd say to make it hard, only numbers without digits after the comma and leading zeros in decimal are allowed.

@SuperKoko: 69694281 is very good :thumb: it would be interesting how you found it. but i guess you won't tell us to preserve your chances to win...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by reset-leo

well, no. i'd say to make it hard, only numbers without digits and leading zeros in decimal are allowed.

---

Numbers without digits? Hm... :confused: :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gstercken

Numbers without digits? Hm... :confused: :D

---

sorry, edited the post.

Quote:

---

@SuperKoko: 69694281 is very good it would be interesting how you found it. but i guess you won't tell us to preserve your chances to win...

---

Typing randomly numbers... And modifying them a bit.
I didn't used any trick.

http://www.google.com/search?q=
The empty string has no leading zero.
And is the representation of the smallest non-negative integer.
:D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SuperKoko

Typing randomly numbers... And modifying them a bit.
I didn't used any trick.

---

that's very good to hear! it leaves the chance for others to find even lower numbers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SuperKoko

http://www.google.com/search?q=
The empty string has no leading zero.
And is the representation of the smallest non-negative integer.
:D

---

maybe the rules are a bit too wague. there must be at least one digit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by reset-leo

here is the goal of the "race": the one, who finds the lowest number which doesn't produce any results on google, wins!

---

Here is a new target :

00000000000000000000109


:D

Ah, okay... Did you mean that numbers with leading zeroes are not allowed, or are they?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by reset-leo

only numbers without digits after the comma and leading zeros in decimal are allowed.

---

Wow, gues what I reached in performing my experiments:

What query did you send through ????

It was a really looooooooong string... :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Siddhartha

It was a really looooooooong string... :D

---

AFAIK, most servers reject URI whose length > 1 kilobyte.

Hmm so you tried to flood google...:mad: :mad: :mad:

hope they dont find out .....:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GremlinSA

Hmm so you tried to flood google...:mad: :mad: :mad:

hope they dont find out .....:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

---

hey, this thread is getting closer to crashing google! :eek:

dtw: no leading zeros, sid.

This link produces a google Error:

http://216.239.59.104/Listprices.asp?ID=155770

I always have to search google to find google...no error