Search:

Sorry, I haven't been watching this the past couple of days. I've actually thought about the design more, and I do think that although I didn't initially require globally unique names, that it does...

Good point.

So if there were three parameters, I would need to have _1, _2, _3?

EDIT: I just confirmed this by testing it.

Thanks nuzzle. I really appreciate the advice and I'll look into this type of solution as well.

Thank you! As you might have noticed, I included the boost/bind header because I was trying to do exactly that, but I only tried it with

p->doOnNameChange(boost::bind(&Container::changeName,...

Thanks for that info. I actually never knew something like that existed, but I like it. I have a follow up question, though. I'm trying to use boost signals to implement what you said, and I want...

Good advice. I see how that could be the case if the names of all prices should be globally unique. However, in this case I only need them to be unique within the container, but I want the price...

I have a container class Price_container that has a private data member of type boost::unordered_map<std::string, std::shared_ptr<Price>> (where Price is a class I've defined).

I provide a...

That was a very useful example. I actually didn't realize that the first code had that triple deletion thing going on. Looks like I have a lot of reading to do...

Exactly what I'm trying to figure out! Thanks for the tips. I appreciate all of the criticism because I really want to learn how to write good code, not just code that works.

I mistyped. I meant when i = 20. i = 20 is an exceptional case because the forwardcurve array only has 20 elements, so trying to get forwardcurve[20] would be out of the bounds. Is it not good...

Thanks for all of the advice. This isn't really anything I'm going to actually use, I'm just sort of testing out what everything in C++ does.

I have this code that creates a custom exception class which has private data members of type const char*. I want to delete those pointers in the destructor, but since the exception is thrown inside...