|
-
December 13th, 2003, 10:35 PM
#1
Front page article
This article from Karl Moore is rather disappointing. In particular, the issue that he covers there is trivial, and it seems as though he doesn't really understand what the "technical" writers are talking about. Linear Congruence random number generators aren't truly random, which is what the technical people talk about, and what he is doing is covering some trivial aspect of seeding using the clock. Does anyone else feel this way?
Brendan
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|