recordcount on a table type recordset

Has anyone experienced the phenomenon of a table type recordset reporting an incorrect record count? I have 376 records in a table. When a dynaset type recordset object is used the correct # of 376 records is reported for its "recordcount" value. Although when I use the table type recordset the amount of 302 is reported for its "recordset" value. Can anyone help solve this mystery?

[santulan]

Hi,

Use .movelast statement before record count.

Santulan

Santulan

Sorry man you really didn't read my question did you? : )

I have refreshed the db by the .movelast .movefirst the problem that the tye dynaset reports the correct # of records while the type table does not. I am perplexed as to why this is happening