|
-
December 13th, 1999, 07:01 PM
#1
Anyone used Win 2000 before?
Is there any difference between Win 95/98 and 2000
-
December 14th, 1999, 01:41 AM
#2
Re: Anyone used Win 2000 before?
I try win2k many times and I get a result
the Win2000 = the best solution to decrase your performance.
after install win2k, my PC become very very slow.....
-
December 14th, 1999, 02:20 AM
#3
Re: Anyone used Win 2000 before?
Windows 2000 is Win NT with all facilities of 98 (like disk defragment, plug and play etc.) and a lot of beautiful graphics. So, I can say that it is stable enough (I use it as Release Candidate 2 since 1 month now) but it is slow enough. Your choice is yours!
Michael Vlastos
Automation Engineer
Company SouthGate Hellas SA
Development Department
Athens, Greece
-
December 14th, 1999, 08:15 AM
#4
Re: Anyone used Win 2000 before?
I have 3 computers at home - 2 of them are HPs and 3rd one is Sony. I tried to use Win 2000 on all of them. I cannot say that it's slowing down the computers. I had problems with drivers for all 3 modems, all 3 soundcards, 1 DVD drive, 2 videocards. I don't remember exactly what hardware I'm using. But all this devices are working fine with NT 4. I've been looking for drivers on WinFiles site and Manufacturers sites. Nothing.
Vlad
-
December 14th, 1999, 08:54 AM
#5
Re: Anyone used Win 2000 before?
I'm using Win2K for some three months, RC1 recognized ALL of my hardware except Adaptec SCSI card without any additional drivers. It works fast enough on my K6-2 with 128Mb RAM. Moreover it's as stable as I could expect form a mutdie.
Jean
[email protected]
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|