Re: I think this is another problem with strings again
I see two critical problems:
1: You need to include <string>, not <cstring>.
2: The constructor of a class must have the same name as the class itself IIRC. construct_player() should be renamed to just player() or, if you want construct_player() to be a regular function member, you must give it a return type (such as void).
Obviously, if you change construct_player() to become the constructor of player(), you can't call the constructor explicitly so the line
"new_player.construct_player();"
must be deleted.
Errare humanum est, ergo non sum humanus.
Reply With Quote
