Ajay :
I'm sorry, but I have to disagree to the fact that CP articles are better than CG's. You will find that a lot of CP articles are just there for the sake of being published. As an article reviewer here for CG ( and Ajay, you should also know this ) is that we concentrate on Quality and not quantity So, saying that CP articles are better than CG's is actually wrong, and unfair towards all the great authors that have contributed to CG. The last time you have submitted an article was in 2005...

I'm not attacking you or anything, I'm saying that if you feel that the CG article system has issues, blame that, and not the articles.

I really disagree with point numer 10 and number 12.

In reference to number 10 : The code does indeed stand out, if the article was correctly formatted with Pre tags, it looks very pretty.

In referenece to number 12 : There is a View Profile link, and an About the author section. When people click on the View Profile link, you'll get access to all the articles the author has written.

Quote Originally Posted by CBasicNet View Post
I remember that there was a time CG was the king in terms of quality programming articles but sadly, CG has been superseded by CP
In quantity perhaps, but not with quality.