Quote Originally Posted by nuzzle View Post
...but the purpose would be the same, to ensure a high standard among practitioners.
I agree, in principle. The problem is who does certificate the certificators (and their associated costs) ? it could seem the chicken-or-the-egg story, but suppose we're lucky and we find an indipendent group of people effectively capable of judging other people's academic education; wouldn't be simpler putting those people directly into universities ?

For this reason, ensuring a high standard should be a prerogative of academic institutions and if for some reason they fail to achieve that it seems unlikely that you'll find better alternatives elsewhere.

Quote Originally Posted by nuzzle
They're forced to demonstrate that they meet a minimum professional standard. Great!
If you're speaking of a minimum professional standard then I totally agree with you.