Quote Originally Posted by eightyfive
You had a wrong interpretation there, because if you read correctly this post you can
discover that I was talking about the bugs in the code, not about compiler bugs.
compiler bugs are the ones inherent to the application itself (compiler).
In post #44, you wrote:
Quote Originally Posted by eightyfive
that's your story, and you say I'm a fool because I found some compiler bugs?
is not my fault if those bugs are there, bugs that you didn't have idea of their existence,
Quote Originally Posted by eightyfive
LOL , tried to be civil?.
As you see I tried to be civil by stop arguing on things that I already understand,
Look at my previous posts. I never called you names. Then look at your post #46, and your other posts where you so quickly claimed that some other user was ignorant of something that they were talking about. So yes, you were not civil, hence I got angry when you so directly attacked me personally.

Quote Originally Posted by eightyfive
The problem was that you kept on repeating to me the same things again and again, and I told you already understood all that.
If you don't seem to understand despite claiming to understand, then you should expect to be told over and over again until you demonstrate that you do understand. That said, in this case it looks like you simply used the wrong term by accident.

Quote Originally Posted by eightyfive
You edited your post but I saw all those insults, nice user.
Yeah, I decided that those insults weren't called for. I may be angry, but that doesn't mean that responding in that way was the right thing to do. This is also why I then made one more edit after dinner, because I realised that perhaps you simply missed my point (which turns out to be closer to the mark that my own initial statement). If you don't want to receive insults, stop giving them.