|
-
January 6th, 2011, 10:07 AM
#20
Re: A better vector trim with move semantics
 Originally Posted by superbonzo
I'm also cautious on using the new move semantics, at least until the new standard gets in a sufficiently "stable" state...
just consider that the draft linked to by monarch_dodra still admits the compiler implicitly generated move ctor/assignment, whilst at the same time guys like Dave Abrahams are strongly advocating their removal from the final standard document ( although, as far as I know, VS2010 already does not provide them ) ...
I agree that the draft still isn't final, but it won't undergo massive changes either. While I haven't fully moved to C++0x either for several reasons, I also think it is important to learn about C++0x and see if it is even worth it.
Plus, I find the move semantics to be incredibly fun.
Is your question related to IO?
Read this C++ FAQ article at parashift by Marshall Cline. In particular points 1-6.
It will explain how to correctly deal with IO, how to validate input, and why you shouldn't count on "while(!in.eof())". And it always makes for excellent reading.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|
Reply With Quote
